Chapter 1: A strange
fact about not learning to read.
1.
What is the strange
fact about not learning to read?
The “strange fact about not learning
to read” discussed in chapter two is that the majority of the students who do
well in early reading are form poor or minority groups with a history of
prejudice and oppression.
2.
Why is this fact so
strange?
This fact is well known, but should
be seen as strange because being poor or a member of a particular social group
has nothing to do with learning to read in school. One of the goals of school
is supposed to be leveling the playing field for all children. These children
do not have less ability to learn, so the connection between socioeconomic
status and reading difficulty is strange.
3. What is it about
school that manages to transform children who at good at learning things like
Pokeman into children who are not good a learning?
Many instructional processes in
today’s schools involve practicing skills outside of the contexts or
experiences in which they are used, including reading instruction. Students who
have no cultural connection to reading through their home life- which is often
the case in poverty stricken homes- must learn reading through a purely instructional
process that is very unnatural. Instead of creating opportunities for all
students to connect culture, interests, and real life experiences to the
process of learning to read, schools often keep a skill and drill approach to
reading that may be helpful to students who experience this connection at home,
but leaves students who don’t get this connection anywhere else behind.
4.
What are the
differences between a traditionalists approach to learning to read and more
progressive educators?
Traditionalists believe that
learning to read is an instructed process that requires overt instruction. They
believe that learning to read can be broken down into sequential steps and
skills: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluent oral reading, and comprehension skills.
According to traditionalists, these steps seamlessly build on one another and guarantee
learning to read.
More progressive educators argue
that meaning-making, rather than technical skills, are more important when
learning to read. They believe that people learn to read most effectively when
they focus on the meaning of the texts. Some support Whole Language, which is
an approach in which reading is treated as a natural process with no
instruction provided. Others believe that learning to read is more of a
cultural process that should be supported by real life experiences as well as
instruction.
5.
Is learning to read a
natural process like learning to speak a language?
Learning to read is not a natural
process because learning to speak a native language is part of the biological
inheritance of human beings. Learning to read is a skill acquired only if the
individual’s culture offers it.
6.
What is the
differences between natural, instructed and cultural processes and which
process should reading be classified under?
Natural processes such as learning
to walk or to speak a first language are part of the biological instincts of
human beings, and are experienced by everyone except those with severe
disorders. Instructed processes are those that are drilled into students by
overt instruction. Some areas in which instructed processes are useful, such as
learning physics, social studies, and mathematics. Cultural processes include
things that are taught to everyone in a culture because they are esteemed
important by that specific group. For example, many cultures stress special
ways of cooking, and skills are passed down through family generations. Reading
is a cultural process because it is taught in many cultures as a skill
necessary to succeed within the society.
7.
How do humans learn
best? Through instructional processes or through cultural processes? How is
reading taught in school?
Humans learn best through cultural
processes rather than instructional processes because through cultural
processes, what is learned becomes important to a person’s identity, views, and
relationship with the world. However, reading is most often taught through an instructional
process in schools, putting many students at a disadvantage.
8.
According to the
author, what is the reason for the "fourth grad slump."
According to the author, many
students appear to do well in learning to read until the fourth grade because
until that point they are able to squeak by with their technical decoding
skills; but when they are required to apply understanding of the texts to new
and more challenging subject matter, the superficiality of their reading
ability is revealed. This is because students have been taught the mechanics of
reading through a shallow instructional method, and have not been taught how
reading is important in areas of their lives outside of school. Therefore,
students have not applied the skill of reading on a deeper, personal level to
be used in areas other than reading class.
9.
What is a better
predictor of reading success than phonemic awareness?
A better predictor of reading success
than phonemic awareness is “early language ability” which the author renames an
“early way with words”. This way with words seems to be the result of family, community,
and school language environments in which children interact intensively with
adults and more mature peers and experience advanced forms of language on
specific and diverse topics.
10.
What is the difference
between "vernacular" and "specialist" varieties of
language? Give an example of two sentences, one written in the vernacular and
one written in a "a specialized variety", about a topic in your
content area.
Vernacular varieties of language are
a form of language acquired by all people early in life that is used for
everyday and face to face conversation. Specialist varieties of language are
used for special purposes or activities such as the language used in the world
of video games.
An example of a sentence containing vernacular
language in the subject of art would be:
“John painted a self-portrait”
An example of a sentence that contains
specialist art language would be:
“John used a number 6 filbert brush
to create the impressionistic brush strokes in his self-portrait that explores constructs
his personal identity.”
11.
What is "early
language ability" and how is it developed?
Early language ability is developed
through exposure to family, community, and school language environments in which
children interact intensively with adults and more mature peers and experience advanced
forms of language on specific and diverse topics.
12.
According to the
author why and how does the traditionalist approach to teaching children to
read fail?
According to the author, the
traditionalist approach to teaching reading fails because it teaches specialized,
academic forms of languages, but it does not start the academic language acquisitions
process for children, a process some get at home and others do not- which is
clearly the difference between students who succeed in early reading and those
who struggle. Also, Traditionalist approaches focus on teaching skills of
reading to students and fail to connect to the their experiences and culture,
which would allow authentic, internalized learning.
13.
Are parents of poor
children to blame for their children's inexperience with specialized varieties
of language before coming to school?
In a way parents are to blame for not
making reading a part of the child’s daily life before and outside of school
because they are putting their child at a
disadvantage However, it is understandable that the parent is overworked,
drained, and does not have positive experiences with reading his/herself.
Schools are ultimately to blame for keeping a system that is clearly flawed;
putting some students at a disadvantage and letting many fall through the
cracks. While it is ideal that parents be closely involved in preparing their children
for education, it is ultimately the school’s job to teach all students to read
well.
14.
Did you struggle with
reading this text? Why? Are you a poor reader or are you unfamiliar with this
variety of specialized language?
Citation
Gee, P. (2004). Situated language and learning a critque of traditional schooling. NY: Routledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment